Ohio Landlord Tenant Law - Guide to Landlord and Tenant Rights

Empowerment through legal rights awareness


Automated Legal Forms
    Property Management Forms         Eviction Guide         Eviction Notice         Tenant Background Check         Attorneys         SEARCH

  Home

  Landlord Rights

  Eviction Guidebook
  Eviction Notice
  Eviction Attorneys
  Landlords Complete Kit
  Collections

  Sample Lease
  Landlord's corner
  Landlord repairs
  Background Check

  Search court records
  Legal eBooks
  Legal Forms
  Land Contract

  Landlord Tenant Act
  Ohio eviction law
  Ohio courts
  Other states law

  Search our site

Can a tenant move out early because of criminal activity at apartment?

Ohio Tenant's Guide to Breaking a Lease

The short answer is "no." A landlord has no duty to protect against criminal activity beyond taking reasonable precautions against it unless the lease places a burden of providing security from criminal activity on the landlord. Investigate the apartment complex before you sign on the dotted line.

Several burglaries, break ins, and even arson had occurred at Tenant's apartment complex. Tenant contacted Landlord about the problems, and all Landlord did was install a few new locks on the common doors. Tenant advised Landlord that he was terminating the rental agreement a month early, reasoning that Landlord's failure to address the criminal problems was constructively (in other words, in actual effect) evicting Tenant from the Apartment. Landlord kept Tenant's security deposit (to make up for Tenant's failure to pay last month's rent) and Tenant sued. The Trial Court ruled in Tenant's favor, holding that Landlord's failure to address criminal problems amounted to constructive eviction. Landlord appealed.

The Tenth District Court of Appeals in Franklin County held in a reported case that a landlord is not an insurer of a tenant against criminal activity by third persons. So long as the landlord takes reasonable security precautions, criminal activity in the area does not rise to the level of constructive eviction allowing tenant to terminate the rental agreement. The Court reasoned as follows:

Generally, . . . where the lease does not place the burden of providing security from criminal activity, the tenant may expect only that reasonable precautions will be taken by the landlord. Nothing more than reasonable security arises from the covenant of quiet enjoyment.

Sciascia v. Riverpark Apartments (1981), 3 Ohio App. 3d 164.

If you found this information helpful and are looking for more information or would like to support this website, please consider ordering a copy of our book on Ohio landlord tenant law.

Disclaimer: The information provided on ohiolandlordtenant.com is not intended to be legal advice, but general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. The law in your state may be different from that discussed here. The facts in your case may be different too.

Having trouble finding what you are looking for, then search our site below:

Google
 
www.ohiolandlordtenant.com
Web site and all contents Copyright ohiolandlordtenant.com 2008, All rights reserved.




  Tenant Rights

  Security deposit
  Break lease
  Fight an Eviction
  Mobile Homes

  Get Repairs Made
  Noisy Neighbors
  Understanding Leases
  Unlawful Evictions

  Rent Escrow Guide
  Forum
  Classifieds
  FAQ

  Search our site
  BLOG
  Contact Us